Ad hominum argument

September 24th, 2009

I saw this video on YouTube, and one of the arguments and counter-arguments struck me as interesting.

What struck me, in the argument and counter-argument, was the ad hominum fallacy.  The ad hominum fallacy is very common in modern political discourse, sadly.  When Kirk says that the Origin of Species is wrong because Hitler had some involvement, he is committing this fallacy.  When Cristina counters that Christianity must be wrong as Hitler claimed to practice it, she is committing that same fallacy.  It’s a common trap to fall into, actually, and you’ll hear it frequently if you listen to political talk radio.

To show where this fails, let’s do a little thought experiment.  Imagine you are in a room.  Inside you find Mother Theresa, arguably the finest person in all humanith, and Adolf Hitler, equally arguably the worst. The following conversation ensues.

Theresa:  You might do well to read Milton’s Inferno as a cautionary tale.

Adolf:  That was Dante, not Milton.

Theresa: No, it was most definitely Milton.

By the logic governing the ad hominum argument we can prove that, as Hitler is trying to aver that Dante wrote the Inferno and Mother Theresa is arguing for it being written by Milton, and that clearly Mother Theresa is both smarter and worthier, that therefore the Inferno was written by Milton.

Except that it wasn’t.

In truth, it doesn’t matter who upholds a particular case, or how many people uphold it (I would love to explain the argumentum ad populam fallacy to the guy on NY1 who claims in one frequently run promo that the majority of New Yorkers “agree with me, not you” and then sits back looking smug having espoused such poor logic).  What matters is the discernible facts and merits of the case at hand.

As to the evolution debate, I favor something Darwin alluded to and a rabbi whose name I still can’t recall expounded on.  Which is more remarkable, for G-d to have hand crafted every species in a labor-intensive brute force method, or for G-d to have set into the world one single-celled organism and one natural law, and have such humble beginnings bloom into all we see around us?

Entry Filed under: Pontification

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. miriam  |  September 24th, 2009 at 8:45 pm

    I think what Cristina was doing was pointing out that Cameron’s argument was fallacious (Hitler referenced Darwin favorably therefore Darwin is evil) by putting up a similar equally fallacious argument that Cameron would immediately reject (Hitler referenced Christianity favorably therefore Christianity is evil) even though the (faulty) logic behind them is the exactly the same in both cases. I don’t think she was literally equating Christianity with Hitler.

    I liked that video. “You EEG-norant MORON!”

  • 2. Ivy  |  September 25th, 2009 at 7:14 am

    She wasn’t equating the two, just pointing out the problem behind that type of logic.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

September 2010
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Recent Posts